The Data on Police Violence & Discrimination

How Many People Are Killed Each Year by the Police?

The truth is, no one knows. We can only estimate. The nation’s police departments are not technically required to report the total number of individuals killed by their officers to the government. The FBI only requests local departments volunteer the information but does not demand it.

The Bureau released its latest Uniform Crime Report earlier this month, reporting 461 people were killed in “justifiable homicides” in 2013. The US Justice Department similarly reports around 400 justifiable homicides annually. However, only about 750 of the nation’s 17,000 local police departments contribute data to these reports. That’s roughly 4 percent.

Numerous criminal justice experts therefore believe the government’s numbers on police-caused deaths are highly unreliable. Several independent tracking groups that monitor reports in online news articles estimate that police kills over 1,000 civilians annually.

One of these trackers, a Facebook page called “Killed by the Police” reports at least 1,002 people have been killed by US police this year. Noted statistician Nate Silver’s website FiveThirtyEight has audited the page in order to insure the validity of the stories the group has cited.

While the numbers are unclear as to how many Americans are killed by police, the available data does indicate young Black men are at particular risk of dying at the hands of law enforcement.

21 Times More Likely to be Killed by Police

ProPublica, a non-profit news corporation, recently reported Black male teenagers are 21 times more likely to be killed by police than white ones. This statistic was found by analyzing the 12,000 police shootings self-reported by departments from 2010 to 2012. Out of every one million White teenage men in America, about 1.5 were killed by police. For every one million Black teenage men, 31 were killed.

police-killings-2-graphic-630The risk of Blacks being killed by police is highest in America’s cities. In Oakland, California during the mid-2000s, a time when only around a third of the city’s population was Black, the NAACP reports 37 of 45 officer-involved shootings were of Black people. That’s over 80 percent.

Of the 8.2 million people living in New York City, just fewer than 25 percent are Black. But according to the 2011 NYPD Firearms Discharge Report, Blacks comprise 50 percent of all those fired upon by police.

Widespread profiling by police goes beyond just acts of violence, however. There were more stops of young Black men by the NYPD in 2011 than there were young Black men in the city.

It is no wonder given this information that African American by and large feel the justice system and police in particular discriminate against them.

Public Perceptions & Racial Injustice

A poll conducted by Gallup in 2012 following the trial of George Zimmerman indicated two-thirds of African Americans believed the US criminal justice system to be biased against Blacks. In contrast, just one quarter of Whites believed the system to be racially biased.

What the poll revealed was the greatest difference in opinion between Blacks and Whites on the matter since Gallup began gaging perceptions of bias in the early 90s.

Fast-forward two years later to the killing of Michael Brown. According to a recently released Huffington Post-YouGov poll, 62 percent of African Americans believe Officer Wilson was at fault in the shooting while only 22 percent of Whites think so. When Bill O’Reilly asked panelists on his show why Blacks continue to hold a mistrust of the justice system, Bob Beckel was quick to respond.

“In that town, 67 percent of them are Black. 93 percent of the stops in cars are of Black people,” Beckel explained. He argued to O’Reilly that repeated profiling and harassment on the part of the police has led African Americans in Ferguson and across the country to expect Officer Wilson to have treated Michael Brown harshly.

However, racial stereotypes also appear to cause the general public to expect certain behaviors from Blacks. In a study recently published by the American Psychological Association, Black boys as young as 10 are generally seen as less innocent as Whites. Black boys on average are seen as older and are more susceptible to police violence.

As UCLA Professor Phillip Atiba Goff put it, “Our research found that Black boys can be seen as responsible for their actions at an age when White boys still benefit from the assumption that children are essentially innocent.”

Just this month in Cleveland, Tamir Rice, a 12-year-old Black youth, was shot and killed by police while brandishing a BB gun in a city park. In the 911 call made by a man who saw the boy pointing his toy gun at people, he twice said the weapon was likely fake and the individual a juvenile.

Nonetheless, police shot Rice within seconds of arriving when the boy drew the BB gun into view. In calling for medical assistance for their shooting victim, the officers described the 12-year-old as appearing to be around 20.

What causes officers to act in such a way that appears to discriminate against African Americans and young Black men in particular? To try and answer this question, we must examine the very structure of America’s police departments themselves.

Policing in America

How to Become a Police Officer

In order to understand police brutality on both ends, it is important to consider the perspective of the police. The role of an officer is to have good judgment, problem solve, empathy and compassion, as well as teamwork and collaboration. Community policing is an important aspect of a law enforcement career. In other words, agencies are looking for individuals who are drawn to and exhibit characteristics in line with the service element of policing over the prospect of excitement and adventure. The requirements to become a police officer include, having proof of American citizenship, depending on the agency meet the minimum age requirement (18-21), have a high school diploma or GED, and meet fitness standards. Applicants are admitted after a pre screening questionnaire, an entrance examination, physical fitness test, background and drug investigations, psychological evaluation, polygraph, and medical exam.

If an applicant reaches the final selection process for the desired police department, it is followed by an executive interview. If the applicant is selected then they are admitted into the academy. The length of academy training varies, but lasts about six months. Cadets participate in rigorous physical training, learn self-defense, and receive firearms instruction. The training focuses not only on the technical aspects of operating weapons safely, but also on decision-making and ethics in the use of deadly force. After the Academy, cadets will participate in Field Training. This can last from 3-6 months or up to a year, depending on the department, until the rookie officer reaches the department’s requirements.

Law Enforcement Code of Ethics

The police have a code of ethics that they must follow in order to rightfully do their job. Police stand in “harm’s way,” not so much against enemies with bullets, but against enemies skilled in every form. The Law Enforcement Code of Ethics (detailed below) published by the International Association of Chiefs of Police, stands as a spirited reminder to the higher order of this calling. The code includes safeguarding lives and property, protecting the innocent, keeping their private lives unsullied, keeping confidential information secret unless otherwise noted, and to recognize that their badge is a symbol of public faith.

  • As a Law Enforcement Officer my fundamental duty is to serve mankind; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and to respect the Constitutional rights of all men to liberty, equality and justice.
  •  I will keep my private life unsullied as an example to all; maintain courageous calm in the face of danger, scorn, or ridicule; develop self-restraint; and be constantly mindful of the welfare or others. Honest in thought and deed in both my personal and official life, I will be exemplary in obeying the laws of the land and the regulations of my department.
  •  Whatever I see or hear of a confidential nature or that is confided to me in my official capacity will be kept ever secret unless revelation is necessary in the performance of my duty.
  • I will never act officiously or permit personal feelings, prejudices, animosities or friendships to influence my decisions. With no compromise for crime and with relentless prosecution of criminals, I will enforce the law courteously and appropriately without fear or favor, malice or ill will, never employing unnecessary force or violence and never accepting gratuities.
  • I recognize the badge of my office as a symbol of public faith and I accept it as a public trust to be held so long as I am true to the ethics of the police service. I will constantly strive to achieve these objectives and ideals, dedicating myself before God to my chosen profession…law enforcement.

Code of Silence

The Code of Silence or “Blue Code” is an unwritten understanding amongst police officers that enforces that officers should not report on the errors or mistakes of their colleagues. Following the code promotes misconduct amongst officers and fosters an unethical environment. It is a form a systematic corruption that has been exposed in several high profile trials.

Police Misconduct

Further research into police life might reveal that police misconduct is a serious problem in America. Historically, reform efforts have failed due to an organizational culture that is resistant to change. Past reforms have been aimed at individual incidents, disregarding underlying organizational problems. Improving public perception has been the goal of past reforms, as opposed to improving organizational soundness. Reform efforts need to be directed at enhancing police organizational culture. These changes will improve workplace ethos, allowing virtuous conduct to flourish. Advancing this organizational culture will encourage police officers to act in a manner consistent with the high trust the public has in this vocation.

How the Media Frames Police

The following clips depict how police officers are framed through several different media portrayals. The first clip shows how a police department promotes the occupation. The Anaheim Police Department is promoting the job and versatility of the police officer and attempts to entice the viewer into ‘joining the force.’ The second clip is from In Living Color in which they poke fun at the code that police officers follow. The clip features themes of police brutality showing that it is an important issue in society; it also draws on themes of discrimination and prejudice when dealing with a “suspect.” The final clip is from a news segment that details the wrongful death of a Black teenager. The clip goes on to explain how the “lack of training” that contributes to police brutality.

Media Coverage of Police Brutality

Media Framing and Priming

Almost every year thousands of Americans hit the streets to protest the brutalization of an American citizen by police officers. The most recent protests and riots have been for the death of teenager Micheal Brown, who was killed by Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson. Many have criticized media platforms for their coverage of these events and others like it. This short film demonstrates some of those criticisms in the framing, representation, and visibility of victims of police brutality.

A major criticism of media coverage is the selection of which stories are told. The film points out the double standard in coverage of the Mike Brown story over stories like the killing of Dylan Taylor or 12 year old Tamir Rice. Visibility of victims is important in telling their stories but so is representation. As we can see in the film, victims are often represented as “thugs”, “aggressive”, or “low life”. Framing victims in such a way paints a narrative that pins them as deserving of the brutality. This was exemplified when the footage that was leaked of Mike Brown allegedly robbing a convenient store before he was shot. Media analyst point out that focusing on the leaked footage builds a profile of Mike Brown as criminal, and leaves Darren Wilson to be the hero in the story. .

Trivialization of Police Brutality  

As demonstrated in the film media coverage of police brutality often attempts to minimize the situation. The trivialization of police brutality is so clearly seen in the clip of Meghan Kelly as she erupts on her producers for interrupting her coverage of Isis with footage of the protest in Ferguson. Meghan Kelly goes on to say that she is discussing the death of an American, as if the protests were not doing the same. Trivialization of police brutality in media takes several forms from distasteful jokes, to the selection of which stories are deemed newsworthy.

Overshadowing brutality with Race 

With each major case of police brutality hours of media coverage is dedicated to stagnant debates about whether or not race is an issue in the case. Though not exactly the same, reflecting on the Trayvon Martin case we see round the clock focus on the racial breakdown of the case. With media focusing on race we will never be able to have a robust discussion about what needs to be done in order to put an end to police brutality.

Power of Sharing: Emotional release

Power of sharing has also proven to be an extremely powerful tool in spreading awareness of police brutality. Alicia Garza created #blacklivesmatter with Patrisse Cullors and Opal Tometi, as a call to action for African-Americans. It was a response to the anti-Black racism and to the ways in which their lives have been diminished. Many young African-Americans posted pictures of themselves on Twitter under the #If They Gunned me Down. “They were protesting the damaging ways in which young black men like Michael Brown are often portrayed in the media. The response demonstrated the scope of what’s informally known as Black Twitter, a virtual community of African-American Twitter users.” Black Twitter is “part cultural force, cudgel, entertainment and refuge. It is its own society within Twitter, replete with inside jokes, slang and rules, centered on the interests of young blacks online.”

#Iftheygunnedmedown, #blacklivesmatter, #Handsupdontshoot, #myNYPD(gone wrong)

If-They-Gunned-Me-Down-August-2014-BellaNaija.com-08

1010

Social media also allows audiences to draw attention to new and related topics. Moreover, they are the one who decides the topics. No one needs to be a journalist to affect the news or to spread out the truth. The comments on current events can provide just as much information as the articles themselves, and the impact of hashtag campaign is tremendous. By using the word of mouth, this is the moment and the opportunity to move forward.

Although social media cannot stop police brutality on its own, it definitely helps keep eyes on excessive force used by police. Social media alerts people to know about what’s really going on, to hold each other accountable for their actions, and to make the changes necessary to create safe, and just, communities.

Changing the Game for Police brutality

Social media has suddenly turned into a powerful tool for the public scrutiny. As a result, traditional media will not be sufficient anymore for framing the police brutality. It is now widely recognized by the rapid postings on Social media websites such as Twitter and YouTube. Ubiquitous social media use pulls back the curtain on police brutality and it fulfills the role of real-time reporting.

In a recent HuffPost Live conversation, Patrisse Cullors weighed in on how social media has shed light on these dark statics. “On a daily basis, every moment, black folks are being bombarded with images of our death, And after a while that does something to you psyche. It is literally saying, ‘Black people, you might be next, You will be next.”

Unnecessary force towards the minority groups existed from the past. However, few lines of text are different from visual displays. Now that these brutal images and videos are available with few clicks, it is implicitly forcing citizens to act against. “This step towards police accountability is the result of the community using media outlets to spread the word about the incident and demanding justice.”

Link to the Live conversatino: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/09/patrisse-cullors-social-media-black-death_n_5956906.html